What if Walt Had Gotten His
EPCOT?
One of the
most tantalizing questions related to the legacy of Walt Disney that I’ve ever
pondered concerns his plans for EPCOT as an actual community and how it would
have turned out had he survived and managed to make it happen.
It’s no real
surprise that following Walt’s death Roy scotched the plans for EPCOT and
redirected focus on the Florida project to The Magic Kingdom and accompanying
hotels. That’s not a criticism of Roy
Disney at all. I believe that were it
not for Roy’s capabilities, many (if not most) of Walt’s visions would not have
come to pass. Clearly, Roy didn’t have
the same attachment to the idea of EPCOT that Walt did and probably couldn’t
begin to fathom all the things that needed to be incorporated from a creative
standpoint. By the same token, was there
anyone in the organization at that time or since who could have taken up the
torch and brought Walt’s vision to fruition?
It is
plausible, however, if Walt had lived another half dozen years that he could
have willed EPCOT into existence. Let’s
face it, Snow White, Disneyland and countless other accomplishments seemed like
true uphill battles at the outset.
I also
imagine that, like Disneyland, EPCOT would have evolved significantly from the
original vision. For anyone who has seen
the film from the fall of 1966 in which Walt outlines the project that it was
enormously sophisticated. The circular
design featured the highest density population at the center, with green belt
surrounding (with single-family homes, etc.) and Monorails and PeopleMovers
connecting the entire thing so that there would be no need for roads and
personal autos (with motorized vehicles traveling beneath the city).
This
orientation with respect to transportation is unique on its own – never mind
any other innovations (which certainly would have sprung from Walt’s mind
during the process of further planning and construction).
However,
here is the big question on my mind: How
would a community designed by Walt Disney and run by his company have
functioned when it went live, 24/7?
The closest
approximation of dealing with a large group of individuals is the execution of
theme park and resort operations. Even
still, people who stay for two weeks at one of the resorts and move between
theme parks at WDW eventually go home, back to the personal space that they
call their own. Sure, staying in a hotel
room allows one to make that their private area for a brief time and act as
they would in their own domicile, but is it really the same thing? You don’t decorate your hotel room, you’re
not responsible for cleaning it, don’t have stacks and piles and clumps of
personal belongings here and there. It’s
a different mindset.
Consequently,
EPCOT would be like guests who never leave.
People become
a little different when they put down roots and consider a town or city their
own. Would there have been conflicts,
grudges, protests and resentments? Would
Disney have had to incorporate an ever-increasing set of rules in order to
maintain the equilibrium? We’ll never know.
Moreover, if
EPCOT as Walt envisioned it had opened in the early ‘70s, how would it have
been reflected in the rapidly changing culture of that period?
I firmly
believe that every bit of Walt’s inspiration for EPCOT was with the best
intentions. I don’t think he was trying
to create a rigid, unforgiving community that demanded complete conformity from
its denizens. I think he wanted to take
the talents that he possessed and direct them toward the complications that always
arise in modern communities. I’m just
not sure Walt Disney – or anyone else for that matter – has the ability to get
around the dysfunction, idiosyncrasies and vast differences between people that
create these things to begin with.
Considering
the degree to which the Disney Company must exert control over the environments
within the theme parks, there’s no way it could have been avoided in an actual
community.
Some may
point out that Disney did end up building a community – Celebration – in the
early 1990s. There is, however, a
distinct difference. Celebration
followed the model of master-planned communities already well-established in
this country. Moreover, Disney
relinquished basic control of the community upon its completion (although they
still have an interest in the utility companies providing services if I’m not
mistaken).
EPCOT, as
Walt envisioned it, could not have functioned that way. He would not have been able to allow the
citizens to make choices about the general direction of the community or the way
in which it was run. (I recall reading
at one point that Walt’s possible solutions to this included having the
residents rotate – a limited period of time for each person/family.)
Consequently,
I’m left wondering how much Walt would have altered his vision I the process of
building it to allow for greater individual freedoms on the part of EPCOT’s
citizenry. I also wonder if he would
have abandoned the idea entirely or transformed it into some other
stratification of a prototype community.
All such conjecture,
of course, is academic. EPCOT became a
theme park where the name – when expanded from the familiar acronym – bears little
resemblance to what actually exists within its confines. This is not to say that EPCOT doesn’t contribute
significantly to the full spectrum of offerings at WDW. Still, what attracted Walt most about the
Florida project in the first place was not a repeat performance of Disneyland
and similar attraction/exhibit-based entities.
He was reaching for that next, seemingly impossible challenge and, I
suspect, would have become bored with the process if his community of tomorrow
was excised from the Florida project.
No comments:
Post a Comment